WHO WILL BRING THE LAWYERS TO AMBIT OFLAW?

                                     WHO WILL WATCH THE WATCH DOG?

The unprecedented acts of hooliganism and vandalism done by a group of lawyers of the Madras High court in the court premises itself has raised the issue that as Policing the Police is becoming gradually difficult, similarly bringing lawyers to the ambit of law is becoming an arduous task.

The lawyers were protesting against an attempt by the police to arrest some accused in connection with a complaint lodged by Subramanyam Swami. The lawyers turned violent and started attacking the police. They set ablaze some vehicles parked in the campus. In a way the acts of violence provoked the police to resort to tough measures. Subsequently the Police also resorted to lathi charge and beat lawyers mercilessly.

The lawyers went on strike and demanded action against, what they call, the brutal actions of the police. The repeated requests by the Supreme Court to the lawyers to call off their strike went unheeded. The strike is still going on the process of law is severly hindered.

The apex court appointed one man panel to probe into this episode headed by retired SC Judge B.N.Srikrishna. The panel submitted its 22 page report to the court and was read out in the court by some senior advocates before the CJI.

The report has deplored and condemned the incident which took place on 19th February in the court premises of Madras HC. J.Srikrishna has termed the actions and behaviours of some of the advocates as ‘hooligans and miscreants’. The group of lawyers were behaving like unruly and rioting mob. It is shame on our judicial system and is an stigma on Judicial history of our country . Lawyers are the part and parcel of the entire criminal justice system and the courts cannot function without the participation of the advocates.

In recent times, a section of lawyers have formed an idea that they can take law in their hands and will go unscathed because they are under illusion that they are running the courts and the courts will not take action or allow any action to be taken against them. The report has rightly indicted the acting Chief Justice of Madras High Court because his infirm and indecisive attitude allowed the situation to go from bad to worse. 

Few days ago, similar incident, though of smaller magnitude and intensity took place inside the court room at Patna High Court. The Judge Mr. D.D. Jha was force to withdraw his order of making arrest of a lawyer for his act of contempt of the court. The said advocate shouted at the highest pitch and called all his companion lawyers. They started slogans inside the court room before the Judge and the Judge could not nothing accept left the chair helplessly and withdrew his order. Only few days before this incident, a section of lawyers and lawyer’s clerk raised slogans against the Chief Justice because the Chief Justice had issued one direction which necessitated the lawyers or the lawyers clerks to verify the stamps, they are furnishing with. This order was made in view of detection of a racket which had been using fake stamps inside the court itself. In this scam, the police said that the involvement of some advocates was allegedly possible. Any way the entire stalemate could only be resolved when this order was withdrawn.Such types of infirm and indecisive attitudes of the court have emboldened the lawyers who have started taking law in their hands.

Rising cases of so called judicial activism, according to some luminaries, are the root cause of such trends. The frequent physical appearance of senior police and civil officers in the courts due to orders of courts have left an impression that the lawyers can teach any officer a lesson if their dictates are not complied with.

Lawyer’s hooliganism and acts of vandalism have also been witnessed in Allahabad HC for more than one occasion. Few months back, a group of lawyers thrashed Pandher and Surendra Kohli, the accused of Nithari massacre, in the premises of Ghaziabad court. Such incidents are common place in our country and thus are a matter of serious concerns. Such types of infirm and indecisive attitudes of the court have emboldened the lawyers who have started taking law in their hands.

Honorable Supreme Court of India has ruled in the famous case of Praveen Bhai Togadi versus State of Karnataka that ‘COURTS SHOULD NOT NORMALLY INTERFERE WITH MATTERS RELATING TO LAW AND ORDER WHICH IS PRIMARILY THE DOMAIN OF THE CONCERNED ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIES. THEY ARE BY AND LARGE THE BEST TO ASSESS AND TO KNOWLEDGE. THE COURT CANNOT IN SUCH MATTERS SUBSTITUTE ITS VIEW FOR THAT OF THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY’{ AIR 2004 SC 2081;(2004)4 SCC 684}. In spite of this the trend of judicial activism in matters of enforcement of law and order continue to show upward direction. Justice Katju has several times has come down heavily against such trend and has preached the judiciary to do the real work of dispensation of justice rather than being swayed by public and media hype.

The report of Justice Shri Krishna has rightly sought the intervention of the apex court. The panel has also suggested framing of certain guide lines for the bar. In fact there is no rule whatsoever in this matter and it is the bar council which regulates the activities of the advocates in India. Bar Councils of states and Bar Council of India themselves are formed in accordance with section 3 and 4 ofAdvocates Act, 1961.Although this Act was amended in 2003, it fail to incorporate provisions therein to regulate the actions of the advocates. Thus at present these bar councils are the only bodies which gives certain broader guide lines to the lawyers, they are becoming ineffective.The bar councils sometimes succumbs to the pressures of the lawyers and thus they are finding themselves not in a position to tame the lawyers

The Parliament should, now come up to take up and tackle this dangerous trends which is spreading like a pandemic contagion in Indian Judiciary. The time has come to frame a strict, elaborate and comprehensive law is enacted in order to ensure that such ailment is cured, and cured forever.

IT-BPO SECTOR TO GROW

(VILLAGE GIRLS USING COMPUTERS;CHANGING FACE OF INDIA)

Defying all the global trends of recession, at least one sector in India is likely to grow in coming fiscal also. If the figures released by National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM) are believed to be true, the IT-BPO sector will touch 60 billion US dollar export in the 2010-11 fiscal.

The Association, while releasing the data, said that the export in current fiscal will touch 47 billion USD whereas; it said, the previous fiscal it was only 31.4 billion USD only.The Association however did not forecast the growth for the next fiscal i.e.2009-10 and presumptions are being drawn by the experts that coming fiscal will be somewhat uncomfortable for this sector also. Thanks to the recession all around the globe. The ‘buy American’ clause in the stimulus package of USA would certainly adversely affect the export prospects and perhaps due to this reason, the growth in export of RT-BPO is not likely to grow well in resonance with the global trend.

The growth in this sector, even in the period of recession, is largely due to expansion in domestic demands. As per the data available with the public domain, the domestic market in India is likely to increase to Rs/-52,200 crore in 2014-15 from Rs/-9200 crore in 2007-08, an increase of about 60%.

With the spectacular growth in the service sector, its contribution to the GDP has touched around 50-52%; the domestic demand of IT software is increasing by leaps and bounds. Even the smaller business enterprises are using IT software to upkeep their accounts to run their business. The entire business in India has underwent a cultural change, in commensurate with the changing pace of time.The contribution of govt’s initiative in the field of IT has also contributed considerably in this growth and its contribution cannot be overlooked. The massive outlay of Rs/-700 Crore for National e-governance Programme (Ne-GP) in the general budget for2009-10 paves way for speedy growth in this sector. All most all govt departments have undertaken huge task of computerising the offices and data with the use of latest software technology. It has also contributed in a big way in terms of increase in domestic demands. The SWAN, SDC and CSC are making impressive headways and hopes are high in the coming years in terms of expansion in the domestic demands.

ANOTHER JOLT FOR CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

                           WHO WILL ADJUDICATE THE JUSTICE?

Delhi High Court stayed the order of CIC on 4th March, 2009, in which the CIC had asked the govt to disclose all the concerned papers related to the appointment of Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court and make these papers available to the petitioner. The CIC had passed this order on January 19th this year and asked the central govt to disclose all the correspondence including the noting on that file which was returned by the then President APJ Abdul Kalam regarding the appointment of Jagdish Balla as the Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court in 2006.

It was only after the return of the concerned file by the then President, the matter came in controversy and the news of Bhalla's alleged involvement in some misconduct during his tenure as judge in Allahabad HC could came in public domain.

The order of the CIC in this regard was of much embarassement for the govt and the Central govt was quick to file an appeal before the HC at Delhi. This stayal is seen as a major relief for the govt but at the same time it is another jolt for the CIC as well as the activists who are fighting against secrecy and confidentiality in the establishement.

Technically speaking, there is no provision of an appeal against the order of the CIC and it is final as per section 19(7) of the RTI Act,2005. The aggrieved party may however, file Writs in HCs or SC as enshrined in the Constitution, on the grounds of infringement of Fundamental Rights. It is being observed, and idea is being formed in the public at large, that in many cases the govt or the public authorities file an appeal before the HC or SC and in most of such cases, the order of the Information commissions are stayed. Many activists fighting for free flow of information raise serious apprehensions on the motive of the govt vis-a-vis transparency and claim that the govt hides the information and thereby nip the growth of right to freedom of free flow of information in the public domain.

Section 9 of the said Act provides for exemptions from disclosure and schedule 2 of the Act enlists 18 organisations which are entitled to exemptions. When two years back the govt sought to ammend this law to bring more exemptions into it, was vehemently opposed by the activists. The media criticised bitterely and govt bowed down and subsequently this proposal was withdrawn.

SOP ON ANVIL TO TACKLE TERRORIST ATTACKS

(BURNING OF TAJ;ATTACK ON INDIAN PSYCHE)

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) is all set to implement a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for tackling terrorists’ crimes and attacks in the country from 31st May of this year.

This SOP has been prepared after 100 days exercise by a group of experts in security matters set up by the MHA after the fiasco of tackling the Mumbai attacks on 26/11 last year. The manner, in which the whole operation was carried out, exposed the lack of proper coordination amongst the security agencies and also witnessed almost total collapse of command and control system, at least in the important initial phase of operation. 

The above Mumbai attacks and subsequent response by the Crisis Management Group in MHA was highly criticized in the media as well as in public domain especially on the point of delayed dispatch and airdropping of NSG Commandos to the site. There was a total confusion on the site of operation and the securities forces were at a loss on the point of taking commands.

In the above circumstances, the MHA had setup a group of experts which after long and arduous deliberations, prepared a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the security agencies tackling the terrorist crimes. This SOP contains list of does and don’ts, it would be followed by all concerned central and state security agencies as well as the external and internal intelligence agencies like I.B. and R.A.W. 

It is pertinent to mention here that the central as well as state security agencies do have the list of does and don’ts and SOP for Anti-Naxal operations.

This is the third important decision in the MHA after Mumbai attacks, first and second being establishment of National Investigation Agency (NIA) and amendment to the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 respetively. Many experts in security and strategic matters believe that clear cut command and control mechanism and zero response time are the keys to success in tackling terrorist attacks. The kind of reflex in the rescue team which the entire world watched when a passenger plane had to make an emergency landing in the Hudson river in USA set an example for many countries including India. We, over a period of time, have created a plethora of security and intelligence agencies, but failed to evolve a scientific, coordinated and coherent system of command and controll. When tragedy occurs, the agencies bestowed on the responsibilities to carry our operations, get themselves at a loss, They usually take more than required time to respond. The recent incidents of narrow escape of President's helicopter at Mumbai air port during the visit was another example of lack of coordinationa command and control mechanism in some areas, which is matter of grave concern. Hopefully, this SOP would be able to eliminate or atleast minimise the chances of such fiasco which we unfortunately watched and experienced during Mumbai attacks.

Discussions are also going to amend the rules related to Media also, so that the entire area, where the operation is to carried out, could be cordoned off. During the Mumbai attacks, some of the electronic media (TV channels) acted in a most irresponsible manner and telecasted live the operation of the securities forces. This has proved disastrous in terms of relayed information to the terrorists inside the hotel as well as their masterminds stationed somewhere else. The amendment in the existing law will enable security agencies to disallow such things to occur.