GOVERNMENT GOES TOUGH ON CORRUPTION

HARBINGER OF HOPES IN THE TATTERED STATE

Government of Bihar is coming out with a comprehensive legislation to confiscate assets of the public servants against whom case (s) of ‘Disproportionate Assets’ have been filed and charge-sheets have been submitted in the court of law. A bill in this regard is likely to be tabled in the forthcoming budget session of the State Legislative assembly itself.

While speaking on a seminar organised by DFID, the CM reiterated his commitment to weed out corruption from governance and hinted at this move. He has geared up the vigilance sleuths in the state and the number of trap cases by the state vigilance bureau has increased many folds. As many as 60 trap case with 68 arrests in 2006, 29 trap cases with 37 arrests in 2007, more than 60 trap case with 70 arrests in 2008 and 7 trap cases with equal number of arrests have been made in 2009. Subsequently cases of Disproportionate Assets are launched but thanks to the slow pace of trial a very few could actually be convicted. Apart from this bureau, one Special Vigilance Unit (SVU) has been set up to take anti- corruption measures against high officials. This Unit has also made some headway with respect to recover huge amount of wealth from the possession of officials including several IAS and IPS officers. Their assets could not be confiscate due to non-availability of any specific law in this regard. To sort out this problem, special courts are to be set up and speedy trial would be started, hinted the sources at the state secretariat.

On the other hand, rules are also likely to be amended and the power of making appointments of Teachers would be snatched from the Panchayats and ULBs representatives very soon. The CM received innumerable complaints of corruption and nepotism during his Vikas Yatras against the Local representatives especially Mukhiyas of the Panchayats. Two years back, the CM had formulated the policy of appointment of Teachers (Bihar Panchayat and Nagar Nikaya shikshak niukti niyamabali’) by Panchayati Raj and ULBs representatives with a utopian idea of devolution of powers to lower level of functionaries as enshrined in the constitution. But this effort has failed miserably due to rampant corruption in the panchayati raj and ULBs institutions. Many academicians are of the opinion that the qualities of the ‘appointed teachers under this scheme’ are hopelessly poor because it is based on ‘counselling’ and not on ‘tests’, which has given ample opportunities to the representatives to play foul in this game. This has adversely affected the qualities of primary education, many people lament.